Turn expensive internal workflows into systems that run themselves.
We design, build and operate AI‑powered internal systems that automate repetitive work across your business.
AI agents where they help. Automation and software where they don’t.
- For businesses with $5M to $30M in revenue
- No long-term commitment
- Start with one workflow
- Keep ownership of everything we build
Today
This is probably costing you more than you think.
None of it shows up as a line item. It shows up as headcount, as overtime, as rework, and as the reason a good employee spends Thursday afternoon in a spreadsheet.
01
Manual handoffs
Someone copies the same information between email, spreadsheets, your CRM and your ERP.
EmailSpreadsheetCRMERP
02
Repetitive decisions
Staff sort, route and approve the same things all day, using rules nobody wrote down.
RequestSomeone who knowsApprovalNothing recorded
03
Reporting work
Hours go into building numbers you should already have — and they arrive out of date.
ExportExportPivot tableSlide
04
Disconnected software
The systems you already pay for don’t talk, so a person becomes the connection.
System AA personSystem B
05
Internal software gaps
A spreadsheet has quietly become business critical, and one person maintains it.
Shared driveOne spreadsheetOne employee
06
AI without ownership
Everyone agrees AI could help. Nobody has time to build it and keep it running.
PilotEnthusiasmNobody owns itShelved
You describe it. We come back with what it costs you today.
AI where it helps. Software where it doesn’t.
We don’t sell AI agents, or automation, or integrations, or internal software. We build the system that fixes the workflow — and it usually needs several of them.
What you already run
- Mailbox
- ERP
- CRM
- Accounting
- Documents
The system we build
What comes out
- Clean records in your systems
- Exceptions, with context
- The KPI, against a baseline
- An audit trail
You bring the workflow. Deciding which of these it needs — and which of them it doesn’t — is our job, not yours.
What you already run
- Mailbox
- ERP
- CRM
- Accounting
- Documents
The system we build
Integrations
We connect the systems you already pay for, so a person stops being the thing that moves data between them.
AI where it earns its place
Reading documents, classifying requests, drafting replies, answering questions. AI agents handle the judgement a rule cannot express — and nothing else.
Automation and business rules
Your actual policy, written down and executed the same way every time. Most of what looks like an AI problem is this.
Human approval
Wherever a wrong call would be expensive, a person decides — with the source document, the reason it stopped, and one click to fix it.
The screens your team works in
The queue, the exception list, the dashboard. Built when nothing off the shelf fits the way you actually operate.
What comes out
- Clean records in your systems
- Exceptions, with context
- The KPI, against a baseline
- An audit trail
You bring the workflow. Deciding which of these it needs — and which of them it doesn’t — is our job, not yours.
Boring screens that make an operation legible.
Every system we build comes with the screens a manager needs to see what moved, what stopped, and what it cost.
The one screen a manager checks to see what is moving, what is stuck and what needs a decision today.
Representative interfaces, not client screenshots. Same layout and density as what we hand over — with no real customer data on a public page.
Today
148
orders in
Auto-processed
91%
no human touch
Exception queue
13
oldest: 22 min
Avg handling
4.1 min
was 27 min
| Order | Customer | Size | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| SO-48213 | Northline Supply | 18 lines | Auto-processed |
| SO-48214 | Verity Industrial | 4 lines | Auto-processed |
| SO-48215 | Kestrel Parts Co | 31 lines | Needs review |
| SO-48216 | Harbour Fittings | 7 lines | Auto-processed |
| SO-48217 | Delta Fabrication | 12 lines | Waiting on stock |
Don’t hire us for an AI transformation. Give us one workflow.
We document it, establish the baseline, build the system, launch it and operate it for 30 days. You see the actual result before deciding whether DevnTech should touch anything else.
- 01Show us the workflow
- 02We map the current process
- 03We establish the baseline
- 04We rebuild it
- 05We deploy it
- 06We measure it
- 07We can keep operating it
If it does not meet the acceptance criteria we agree before development starts, there is no implementation fee.
Built for established businesses. Typically best suited to organizations with $5M+ in annual revenue and recurring internal processes.
We have been building software for years.
Platforms, integrations and internal systems for companies who had to keep operating while we changed them.
Event scheduling, user management and reporting were spread across the product and a set of external tools, and the platform could not be extended safely because so little of it was covered by tests.
What changed. Rebuilt the backend around event scheduling, user management and data management as first-class pieces rather than bolt-ons.
Read what changed35% → ~100%
automated test coverage
Security training content had to be tailored per employee, and the team could not produce and deliver it at that granularity by hand.
What changed. Built the services that generate personalized training content per user instead of one course for everyone.
Read what changedNo baseline captured
This engagement predates our measured-baseline process. We are not going to invent a before-and-after figure for it.
Recruiters were working across disconnected tools — job boards, CRMs and applicant tracking — and re-entering the same candidate data in each one.
What changed. Built the integrations that let the platform exchange candidate and job data with the third-party systems agencies already use.
Read what changedNo baseline captured
This engagement predates our measured-baseline process. We are not going to invent a before-and-after figure for it.
“He completed the task quickly, efficiently, and comprehensively and was able to explain extremely technical work product in a way that a business person like me can understand. Highly recommend!”
Senior React/Vite Developer, 2-week MVP sprint
“Rumman has done an exceptional job as our frontend developer. He showed proficient skills in Next.js and React, implementing best practices that have significantly improved the quality and maintainability of our code.”
Front End Developer, Next.js
“They reproduce the issue, explain the cause in plain terms, and ship fixes in planned sprints.”
Verified Clutch review, Feb 2026
“Most companies don’t need another AI demo. They have actual operational problems.
Information gets copied between systems, people spend hours preparing reports, workflows depend on a spreadsheet somebody built four years ago, and nobody owns improving them. That’s the problem we built DevnTech around. Show us the process. We’ll work out whether AI, automation, an integration or plain software is the right answer, and we’ll measure whether it actually improved anything.”
- Runs the workflow reviews
- Personally, on the first call
- Decides what gets built
- Not a salesperson who hands you off
- Years shipping production software
- Not an AI agency founded last year
Show us the process that wastes the most time.
We’ll tell you what should be automated, what AI should handle, what should stay plain software, and whether rebuilding it is worth what it would cost.